company-law

Liquidation Reforms 2026: Eliminating Duplicate Claim Verification for Faster Asset Distribution

How IBC 2.0 streamlines the liquidation process by eliminating duplicate claim verification, introducing CoC oversight of the liquidator, and enabling administrative claim updates.

Alok K Acharya & Associates
15 August 2026ยทUpdated 15 August 20266 min read
Need Professional Assistance?Explore our related service offering

Liquidation Reforms 2026: Eliminating Duplicate Claim Verification for Faster Asset Distribution#

When a corporate debtor enters liquidation under the IBC โ€” either because no resolution plan was approved during CIRP, or because the CoC voted for liquidation โ€” the process under the original Code required the liquidator to start fresh: re-inviting claims, re-verifying each claim against the debtor's books, and re-establishing the priority waterfall. This duplication was one of the primary reasons Indian insolvency liquidations averaged 2โ€“3 years to complete. IBC 2.0 addresses this directly.

The Duplication Problem#

Under the original IBC, the transition from CIRP to liquidation involved:

Claims Already Verified in CIRP#

During CIRP, the Resolution Professional (RP) undertakes comprehensive claim verification:

  1. Issues public notice inviting claims
  2. Receives claims from financial creditors, operational creditors, and other stakeholders
  3. Verifies each claim against the corporate debtor's books, bank statements, and contracts
  4. Admits, partially admits, or rejects each claim
  5. Constitutes the CoC based on verified financial creditor claims

This process typically takes 30โ€“45 days and involves significant professional effort.

The Same Claims Re-Verified in Liquidation#

When CIRP fails and liquidation begins, the original Code required the liquidator to:

  1. Issue a fresh public notice inviting claims (Regulation 12 of IBBI Liquidation Regulations)
  2. Receive claims โ€” the same creditors resubmit substantially the same claims
  3. Re-verify each claim independently โ€” even if the RP had already verified it during CIRP
  4. Admit, partially admit, or reject each claim โ€” often reaching the same conclusions
  5. Constitute the stakeholders' consultation committee

This re-verification added 60โ€“90 days to the liquidation timeline with no new information and significant professional fees.

The IBC 2.0 Fix#

Carry-Forward of CIRP Claims#

IBC 2.0 provides that claims verified and admitted during CIRP are automatically carried forward into liquidation without re-verification:

  • The liquidator accepts the RP's verified claims list as the starting point
  • Only new claims (from creditors who did not participate in CIRP) require fresh verification
  • Only disputed claims (where the creditor or debtor challenged the RP's verification during CIRP) require reconsideration

Administrative Claim Updates#

The amendment introduces an administrative update mechanism for changes that occur between CIRP conclusion and liquidation commencement:

  • Interest accrual โ€” claims are updated for interest accrued during CIRP (where contractually applicable)
  • Partial recoveries โ€” if any creditor received partial payment from resolution plan discussions or interim distributions, the claim is adjusted
  • Currency conversion โ€” foreign-currency-denominated claims are updated to the exchange rate as of the liquidation commencement date
  • Statutory additions โ€” government claims that crystallised during CIRP (e.g., assessment orders issued during moratorium) are added

These updates are administrative โ€” they do not require fresh verification proceedings, hearings, or adjudication unless the debtor or another creditor objects.

Same-Liquidator Provision#

IBC 2.0 introduces a preference (though not a mandate) for appointing the CIRP RP as the liquidator where the CoC consents. This provides:

  • Continuity of institutional knowledge
  • No learning curve on the corporate debtor's affairs
  • Faster transition from CIRP to liquidation
  • Reduced professional fees (the RP already has the claims data, financial records, and stakeholder relationships)

CoC Oversight During Liquidation#

Under the original Code, the CoC's role effectively ended when CIRP concluded. In liquidation, creditors participated through a largely advisory Stakeholders' Consultation Committee (SCC) with limited powers. IBC 2.0 changes this:

Enhanced CoC Powers#

  • The CoC continues to function during liquidation (in addition to the SCC)
  • CoC approval is required for asset sale decisions above a prescribed threshold
  • The CoC can direct the liquidator to pursue specific recovery actions (including avoidance applications under Sections 43โ€“46)
  • CoC meetings must occur at least monthly during liquidation
  • The liquidator must provide fortnightly financial updates to the CoC

Accountability Mechanisms#

  • Liquidator must submit a quarterly progress report to NCLT
  • CoC can apply to NCLT for liquidator replacement if performance is unsatisfactory
  • Fee structures for liquidation professionals are subject to CoC approval (not just IBBI guidelines)

Timeline Impact#

The cumulative effect of these reforms on liquidation timelines:

StageOriginal IBCIBC 2.0
Claims re-verification60โ€“90 daysEliminated (carry-forward)
Liquidator appointment and handover30โ€“45 days7โ€“14 days (same-RP provision)
Asset identification30โ€“60 daysReduced (RP data carry-forward)
Asset sale process90โ€“180 daysSimilar (market-dependent)
Distribution30โ€“60 daysStreamlined (pre-verified claims)
Total estimated12โ€“36 months6โ€“12 months

Other Liquidation Reforms#

Avoidance Actions#

The amendment streamlines preferential transaction (Section 43), undervalued transaction (Section 45), and fraudulent trading (Section 66) applications:

  • Liquidator can initiate avoidance actions without fresh NCLT leave if the RP had already identified the transactions during CIRP
  • Time limits for filing avoidance applications run from CIRP commencement, not liquidation commencement โ€” preventing expiry during the transition

Going-Concern Sale#

IBC 2.0 explicitly empowers the liquidator to pursue a going-concern sale as the preferred asset disposal method:

  • Going-concern sale preserves employment, supplier relationships, and customer contracts
  • The liquidator can package assets, contracts, and workforce as a single lot
  • CoC approval is required for going-concern sale terms
  • Going-concern sale takes priority over piecemeal asset auction unless the CoC determines otherwise

Key Takeaways#

  • CIRP-verified claims carry forward to liquidation automatically โ€” no re-verification
  • Administrative updates handle interest accrual, partial recoveries, and currency conversion
  • The CoC retains oversight during liquidation with enhanced powers over asset sales and liquidator accountability
  • Same-RP appointment streamlines the CIRP-to-liquidation transition
  • Going-concern sale is now the preferred asset disposal method
  • Expected liquidation timeline reduction: 12โ€“36 months to 6โ€“12 months

Need Help With Your Tax Filing?

The firm can help you file your ITR accurately, review applicable deductions, and ensure compliance. Get started in minutes.

Was this article helpful?

AK

Alok K Acharya & Associates

Chartered Accountants

Chartered Accountants

Related Articles

Incorporate Your Startup

Talk to the firm

Start Now